Four arrangements, and why the words matter
These terms get used loosely everywhere. The manufacturers themselves distinguish them, and the difference decides your minimum order.
Strip away the jargon and there are four things you can buy.
- Private label: an existing watch, already designed and in production, with your name on the dial. You choose from a catalogue.
- ODM (original design manufacturer): the manufacturer's design, modified for you; a different dial, a different strap, sometimes a different case or movement.
- OEM (original equipment manufacturer): your design, built to your drawings. One manufacturer puts it as "completely custom, made from scratch watches tailored to a customer's individual designs and specifications".
- Contract assembly: you source components yourself and pay someone to put them together and inspect them.
The distinction is not academic. It is the single biggest determinant of how many watches you must order, and manufacturers price it into published tiers, as the next section shows.
The minimum order
The question everyone asks first. Some manufacturers publish the answer on their own websites.
A minimum order quantity (MOQ) is the smallest run a manufacturer will accept. It is usually treated as something you have to email for. Some publish it.
One manufacturer publishes two figures side by side, and the gap between them is the whole point of the previous section: "Choose from our standard catalog and enjoy minimum order quantity of 12 pieces" for its existing models, against "Minimum order quantity 500 pieces" for custom projects designed from scratch.[Morriss (own site)] Twelve watches if you take the design as it is; five hundred if you want your own.
Another publishes a four-step schedule keyed precisely to how much you change: "Custom logo or engraving (no minimum order)"; "100-150 qty. minimum" where the band or dial changes; and "300-500 pieces per style" for OEM production made to your own specifications.[SUPERTIME (own site)] The same manufacturer publishes its payment terms and a staged lead time running from design through prototype to production.
And this is not only an Asian practice, which is worth saying because it is widely assumed to be. A Swiss company in Solothurn, which states that "For over 40 years, Chrono AG has specialised in quality Swiss Made private label watches"[Chrono AG (own site)] and carries the tagline Swiss Made since 1981, publishes: "Order from as few as 25 pieces per style from our ready-made collection."[Chrono AG (own site)]
What the published numbers do and do not tell you
These are the terms three companies publish about their own services, quoted as they publish them. They are not a survey, not a market rate, and not a recommendation of any of these firms; this Codex has no basis to assess any manufacturer and does not attempt one. Other manufacturers publish nothing at all, and an unpublished minimum is not necessarily a higher one. What the figures establish is narrower and still useful: the entry point is published, it varies by an order of magnitude with how much you customise, and it is not uniformly in the hundreds.
Buying the movement
A consistent pattern across every movement supplier examined: everything technical is published, nothing commercial is.
Several of the largest movement makers say openly that they supply other brands. A Japanese maker founded in Ginza in 1987 describes "designing, developing, and producing a diverse and innovative range of watch movements for clients across the global watch industry".[TMI (own site)] Citizen's movement arm states that "MIYOTA has been supplying movements to brands around the world since the 1980s."[Miyota (own site)] A Swiss maker describes producing movements "with Swiss precision for famous watch brands worldwide".[Ronda (own site)]
All of them publish a great deal: full calibre catalogues, technical drawings, dimensions, parts lists, user manuals, discontinued-product guidance. None of them publishes a price or a statement of who may become a customer. One does publish a minimum order: Miyota's own product page for its Caliber 9015 states "Minimum unit order : 1000pcs per each model" alongside a two-month-plus lead time.[Miyota (own site)] This page did not originally record that figure; it was found and added in a later session (see the corrections log), so the honest statement is that a movement supplier's minimum order can be published on an individual calibre's own page even where the supplier's general FAQ says only that prices and minimums "vary". The route to buy is still to contact sales in every case examined.
Two silences are worth naming precisely. ETA (the Swatch Group's movement maker, and the subject of a long and widely-discussed history of restricting outside supply) says on its own site only that it "develops and produces quartz, mechanical and Swatch watch movements",[ETA (own site)] and states nothing whatever about supplying brands outside the group, in either direction. This Codex therefore records no position for ETA rather than repeating the account that circulates elsewhere.
Seiko is the other. Its group describes itself as "one of the few fully integrated watch manufacturers",[Seiko Group (own report)] which is a claim about making for itself, not for others. Third-party movement supply does surface in Seiko's own filings: its annual securities report records that a Hong Kong subsidiary "engages in sales of watch movements",[Seiko Group (own report)] without saying to whom. Time Module, quoted above, is the group company that states the business plainly.
Not one of them names a customer
Across the manufacturers whose sites were read for this page (movement suppliers and full-watch makers alike), not one names a client. At least one sells that as a feature: a Swiss private-label maker founded in 1992 offers "complete discretion" in its own description of itself.[ITS TIME (own site)] A reader should take the practical consequence seriously: you generally cannot verify who made a given watch, and this Codex will never claim to know.
What you may call it
The Swiss Made question, answered from the ordinance itself rather than from a guide to it.
"Swiss Made" is not a marketing phrase; it is a condition of Swiss federal law, and the law is short enough to read. Under the ordinance of 23 December 1971, a watch is Swiss if its technical development is carried out in Switzerland, its movement is Swiss, that movement is cased up in Switzerland, its manufacturer carries out the final inspection in Switzerland, and at least 60% of the cost of manufacture is generated in Switzerland.[Swiss ordinance RS 232.119] A separate article applies a second test to the movement itself, including that at least 50% of the value of its components is of Swiss manufacture, excluding assembly.[Swiss ordinance RS 232.119]
The question a brand owner actually asks, and what the text does and does not say
If you have watches made for you, can they be Swiss Made? The honest answer requires reading how the law is drafted. Every criterion in the ordinance attaches to the watch, not to the person who commissions it. Article 1a is a series of clauses qualifying the object: «Est considérée comme montre suisse la montre: dont le développement technique est effectué en Suisse…»; and the article that opens the rules on using the designation grants that permission to the product too: «Ne peuvent être utilisés que pour des montres suisses et des mouvements suisses…»[Swiss ordinance RS 232.119]
No word for the commissioning party (mandant, donneur d'ordre, titulaire de la marque) appears anywhere in the text, nor any requirement as to nationality, domicile or place of business. The single personal noun in the criteria is le fabricant, and it appears only to fix where the final inspection must happen.
That is silence, and this Codex publishes it as silence rather than as permission. The ordinance does not address outsourced or private-label manufacture at all: neither allowing it nor forbidding it. What can be said with confidence is only this: the conditions are territorial and operational, and the text imposes none of them on who places the order. Anyone relying on that for a real venture needs a Swiss lawyer, not a reference site.
Three further provisions matter to anyone labelling a watch. If the watch is not Swiss, Swiss designations may still be applied to a Swiss movement inside it, but only "à condition qu'elles ne soient pas visibles de l'acheteur de la montre", on condition they are not visible to the purchaser.[Swiss ordinance RS 232.119] The marking "Swiss movement" may appear on a watch containing one, with the word movement spelled out in full and in type identical in size and colour to the word Swiss.[Swiss ordinance RS 232.119] And the case has its own test: at least one essential manufacturing operation (stamping, machining or polishing) performed in Switzerland, assembled there, inspected there, and 60% of its cost of manufacture generated there.[Swiss ordinance RS 232.119]
A precision about the text this Codex quotes
Swiss federal law is authentic in German, French and Italian. There is no official English version of this ordinance. The French consolidated text is quoted above and any English wording here is this Codex's own rendering, marked as such; English translations published by industry bodies are courtesy translations, not law. It also follows that a private-label seller's summary of the criteria is not the criteria; at least one such seller found while researching this page states the Swiss Made rule incorrectly on its own website. Read the ordinance.
What has to be stamped on it
Two obligations that fall on the brand owner rather than the factory, both published in full.
Importing into the United States. Watches are singled out in US customs regulation: the marking requirements on them "are intensive and require special methods".[US customs regulation] The operative rule sits in the tariff schedule, and it is specific. A movement or case may not be entered "unless conspicuously and indelibly marked by cutting, die-sinking, engraving, stamping (including by means of indelible ink), or mold-marking (either indented or raised)".[HTSUS Ch. 91] Watch movements must be marked on a bridge or top plate with the country of manufacture, the name of the manufacturer or purchaser, and the number of jewels in words; watch cases on the inside or outside of the back with the country of manufacture and the name of the manufacturer or purchaser.[HTSUS Ch. 91]
Read that second requirement again if you are starting a brand: the name that must appear may be the purchaser's rather than the factory's. The customs regulation adds that the name used may be a registered trade name, that a trade mark alone will not satisfy it, and that the purchaser meant is the importer.[US customs regulation]
A discrepancy this Codex does not resolve
The customs regulation says no "movement, case, or dial" may be released until marked in compliance with Additional U.S. Note 4.[US customs regulation] Note 4 itself sets out requirements for movements and for cases, and imposes no marking requirement on the dial at all.[HTSUS Ch. 91] The two texts do not line up. Both are quoted here as they stand; which governs in a given case is a question for a customs lawyer, not for this page.
Precious metal cases sold in Switzerland. A second obligation attaches to the cases themselves, and the wording is deliberately broad: "All watch-cases in gold, silver, platinum or palladium, of foreign or local manufacture, sold in Switzerland, are subject to control and compulsory official marking."[Swiss customs] Of foreign or local manufacture: having the cases made abroad does not avoid it. Such articles must also carry a responsibility mark registered in Switzerland, for which the published registration fee is CHF 800 per mark, valid for twenty years.[Swiss customs]
What the official record shows
Two outcomes, both from primary documents. No lessons are drawn from either.
That the model is mainstream is documented in a regulatory filing. Movado Group states in its annual report to the US Securities and Exchange Commission: "The Company does not manufacture any of the products it sells", and that its "Movado (with the exception of certain Movado collections), EBEL and Concord watches, as well as certain Calvin Klein watch styles, are manufactured in Switzerland by independent third-party assemblers using Swiss movements".[SEC filing] A listed watch group, filing under penalty, describing the arrangement this page documents.
An outcome that went well is recorded in the same company's filings. A watch brand founded on outsourced manufacture "achieved revenue of approximately $71 million" in its last full year before acquisition, and was bought for "an initial payment of approximately $100 million" plus contingent payments.[SEC filing]
An outcome that went badly is recorded in the United Kingdom's official public record. A London watch brand entered insolvent liquidation on 8 October 2018, and the notice appears in The Gazette with the company's registered number and address.[The Gazette] The notice records the fact and the date; it states no cause, and neither does this page.
Why there is not a longer list here
Failures are the more instructive half and the harder half to source. Enforcement actions against unfulfilled crowdfunding campaigns exist and are fully documented, but the ones found concerned other products, not watches. A watch company's Chapter 11 filing was found, but it was a manufacturer that makes watches for other brands (the opposite side of this page's subject). A cautionary tale without a primary record is exactly what this Codex refuses to publish, so the record here is two entries long rather than padded with stories.
One regulator record sits directly on a question founders ask constantly: what may you say about where your watch is made? The US Federal Trade Commission, closing an investigation into a watch company's origin claims, stated the standard: unqualified "Made in USA" or "Built in USA" claims "likely suggest to consumers that products are 'all or virtually all' made in the United States".[FTC] A watch assembled domestically from imported movements is the case the standard was applied to.
Questions this page answers
The real questions people arrive with, and where each is answered above.
- What is the minimum order for a private-label watch?
- Published figures range from no minimum for logo-only work to 1,000 pieces per model, published by a movement maker for one named calibre. Manufacturers' own published terms are quoted in The minimum order.
- Can I put my own brand on a watch I did not make?
- That is what private label and ODM are. See Four arrangements for what distinguishes them.
- Can a watch made for me be called Swiss Made?
- The ordinance's criteria attach to the watch, not to who commissions it, and the text is silent on outsourced manufacture. See What you may call it.
- Who supplies watch movements to other brands?
- Several makers say so openly; none publishes prices, but one movement maker publishes a minimum order on an individual calibre's own page. See Buying the movement.
- What must be marked on a watch imported into the United States?
- Country of manufacture and the name of the manufacturer or purchaser, by specified methods. See What has to be stamped on it.
- Do I need a hallmark?
- For precious-metal cases sold in Switzerland, yes, including cases made abroad. See What has to be stamped on it.
- Which brands are made by which factory?
- Not published. No manufacturer examined for this page names a single client, and two advertise discretion as a service.
What could not be sourced
Named, so that the gaps are visible rather than papered over.
- Any manufacturer's client list. Not one names a customer.
- Movement suppliers' commercial terms. No price and no eligibility rule was published by any of them. One minimum-order figure was found on an individual product page (Miyota, Caliber 9015, see Buying the movement) after this page's first version said none existed; this correction is logged.
- ETA's position on outside supply. Its own site is silent, so this page records no position.
- A documented failure of a crowdfunded watch brand. Enforcement records exist for other products; none specific to a watch was found.
- Soprod's own statements. Every route to the company's website was refused from this environment.
- An Indian watch-industry trade body. No official site was found.
- Any assessment of any manufacturer. Not a gap but a rule: this Codex documents what firms publish and never evaluates them.
Sources
Every claim above traces to one of these. The law is quoted from the Swiss Confederation's own consolidated text; the marking rules from the United States' own tariff schedule and customs regulations; the outcomes from filings with the SEC, a notice in the United Kingdom's official public record, and a letter from the Federal Trade Commission. Where a manufacturer's own terms are quoted, the chip is clay-coloured and says so: a company is a Tier 1 source for what it itself offers, and for nothing else. No marketplace listing, trade directory, dealer blog, enthusiast site or "top manufacturers" list was used for anything on this page. All read 27 September 2026.
- Tier 1 Morriss Horological Limited: ODM and OEM services page, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 SUPERTIME: OEM / ODM page, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 CHRONO AG: Swiss Made private label watches, Solothurn, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 Time Module Inc. (TMI): About Us, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 MIYOTA (Citizen Watch Co., Ltd.): Brand page, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 Ronda AG: Company site, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 ETA SA Manufacture Horlogère Suisse: Enterprise page, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 Seiko Group Corporation: Watch business page, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 Seiko Group Corporation: Annual Securities Report, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 ITS TIME LTD: Company page, Zuchwil, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 Swiss Confederation: Ordonnance du 23 décembre 1971 réglant l'utilisation du nom «Suisse» pour les montres (RS 232.119), art. 1a, état le 1er janvier 2019, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 US Customs and Border Protection: 19 CFR 134.43(b), Methods of marking specific articles, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 United States International Trade Commission: Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, Chapter 91, Additional U.S. Note 4, Special Marking Requirements, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 US Customs and Border Protection: 19 CFR 11.9, Special marking on certain articles, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 Swiss Federal Office for Customs and Border Security: Precious metal control, watch cases, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 Swiss Federal Office for Customs and Border Security: Responsibility mark, registration and renewal, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 Movado Group, Inc.: Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 31 January 2024, filed with the SEC, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 Movado Group, Inc.: Exhibit 99.1 to a Form 8-K filed with the SEC, 2018, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 The Gazette (United Kingdom): Notice 3146167, published 7 November 2018, notice code 2403, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 US Federal Trade Commission: Bureau of Consumer Protection, Division of Enforcement, closing letter to Niall Luxury Goods, LLC, 20 November 2015, source read 2026-09-27
- Tier 1 MIYOTA (Citizen Watch Co., Ltd.): Caliber 9015 product page, source read 2026-09-28